Interview with Thiruvenkata Babuji Baskaran, Molex
“A digital twin can predict current-related failure modes very well”
Thiruvenkata Babuji Baskaran, engineer specialising in structural simulation, studied materials and predictive engineering and focuses on digital twin technologies for automotive connectors.
Molex LLC
As rising system complexity challenges validation in automotive development, digital twins are becoming a key enabler. Thiruvenkata Babuji Baskaran, Molex, explains how virtual validation transforms connector design and testing.
As software-defined vehicles increase
system complexity, traditional validation approaches are reaching their limits,
particularly for components such as electrical connectors that must meet strict
reliability and durability requirements. Physical testing alone is no longer
sufficient to explore the growing number of design permutations and operating
conditions.
Thiruvenkata Babuji Baskaran, Predictive Functional Leader at
Molex, focuses on advancing high-fidelity digital twin
technologies for connector development. With extensive experience in
simulation, material characterisation and structural analysis, he works on
enabling virtual validation strategies that reduce development time while
maintaining engineering confidence.
At the Bordnetzkongress 2026 in
Ludwigsburg, Baskaran presents how digital twins can be used to predict
failure modes, improve design robustness and potentially reduce the need for
physical validation phases. In the following interview, he explains how simulation, data and engineering workflows must evolve
to make this approach scalable.
ADT: Looking ahead five years, what will be the single biggest challenge for the wiring harness and EDS industry
and why?
Baskaran: Managing increasing electrical power density and
system complexity under aggressive cost and timing pressure. Rapid electrification, from 48 V to high-voltage
architectures, higher current density in compact packaging, weight
reduction versus durability trade-offs, and shorter OEM development cycles all
contribute to this challenge.
What is the one capability companies must build now to
make data-driven harness development scalable?
The real enabler is not more simulation, but a closed-loop
data ecosystem in which every simulation and test becomes reusable engineering
intelligence, supported by a simulation process data management system. Such an
infrastructure enables scalable digital engineering workflows through automated
cross-functional integration, as well as traceable and reusable engineering
data, which becomes the foundation for AI-driven
solutions. It also supports AI-assisted design exploration to evaluate
large design spaces and accelerate decision-making.
Which connector failure modes can a digital twin
realistically predict today and which remain largely empirical?
A digital twin can predict connector mechanical behaviour
and current-related failure modes very well. However, several aspects remain
largely empirical, including fretting corrosion, micro-motion-induced contact
resistance drift, and long-term plating degradation.
What inputs are essential for credible virtual
validation, such as materials data, contact models, manufacturing tolerances or
load cases?
Credible virtual validation depends on a comprehensive set
of inputs. Materials data must include temperature-dependent modulus and yield,
creep and stress relaxation curves, ageing degradation factors and anisotropic
properties, for example in glass-fibre-reinforced plastics. Contact modelling
requires assumptions about surface roughness, appropriate friction model
selection, non-linear contact stiffness and friction coefficients that
accurately reflect the system. Manufacturing effects must also be considered,
including injection moulding simulation, fibre orientation, weld line
locations, dimensional tolerance stack-up and residual stress from forming. In
addition, realistic load cases such as thermal cycling ranges, mating and
unmating cycles, and assembly conditions are essential.
How do you correlate simulation with test results and
what is your approach to model calibration and confidence?
A structured approach is required to ensure correlation and
model confidence. This typically begins with baseline geometry validation,
followed by calibration of the material model using coupon tests.
Sub-assemblies are then validated before moving to system-level validation.
Throughout this process, force prediction error is tracked, sensitivity studies
are used to understand dominant variables, and confidence bands are defined.
Confidence in the model is further supported by gauge repeatability and reproducibility,
clearly defined assumptions and quantified error margins.
Where does digital twin adoption create the biggest time
saving, such as in the concept phase, design iterations or qualification
planning?
While the qualification phase sees efficiency gains, the
concept phase represents a more fundamental transformation. Time savings
include a 30 to 50 per cent reduction in late design changes, faster
convergence during the design verification phase and fewer redesign loops
during production validation.
Finally, what do you personally hope to take away from
the Bordnetzkongress 2026 in Ludwigsburg?
The main objective is to gain a clearer understanding of
evolving OEM and Tier supplier expectations. Simulation and digital engineering
address part of the challenge, but the key lies in aligning these capabilities
with real industry needs, whether in faster development cycles, higher power
architectures or improved reliability. Conferences such as the Bordnetzkongress
help clarify where these priorities are heading and how capabilities must
evolve to support them.