3 Questions for… Johannes Pallasch, Head and Spokesman of the National Centre for Charging Infrastructure (NOW)
“Distribution grid operators need transparent guidelines”
With a background in economic geography and an MBA from Steinbeis University Berlin, Johannes Pallasch has been actively engaged in the fields of electromobility and charging infrastructure for many years.
NOW GmbH, Franz Josef
In the run-up to the ChargeTec Conference, we posed three questions to Johannes Pallasch, Head and Spokesman of the National Centre for Charging Infrastructure (NOW). The 5th edition of the international event will take place on 27 and 28 May 2025 in Munich.
Pallasch is set to open the session “Political Framework in
Europe and the Middle East”. His keynote—titled “Germany is Charging:
Challenges and Solutions in Building a Charging Infrastructure for the Mass
Market”—will address both the obstacles and opportunities on the road to
nationwide coverage.
In this interview, Pallasch outlines the regulatory levers
that need to be activated, the interplay between private and municipal
stakeholders, and what recent findings from pilot projects mean for Germany’s
future charging landscape.
ADT: Which specific regulatory or financial instruments
are most urgently needed to accelerate the mass-market expansion of charging
infrastructure in Germany?
Pallasch: A nationwide and future-ready expansion of charging infrastructure
requires decisive action on several levels. Most crucial is the acceleration of
permitting procedures—especially for publicly accessible charging points—as
well as the introduction of clear, standardized regulations for grid
connections. Distribution grid operators need transparent guidelines to
implement connection processes swiftly and cost-effectively. At the same time,
grid expansion must be planned proactively to avoid future bottlenecks or
delays in connecting new charging points.
On the financial side, significant action is still needed,
particularly regarding the heavy-duty vehicle sector. Substantial investment is
required to build a high-performance charging infrastructure. Therefore,
special emphasis should be placed on targeted funding instruments—as explicitly
outlined in the coalition agreement.
How do you assess the role of public versus private
investment in the current expansion strategy?
Private investors—from the fuel retail, retail, or energy sectors—currently
contribute the majority of investments in charging infrastructure, especially
in public spaces. The installation and operation of charging points are
generally the responsibility of private-sector stakeholders and require active
willingness to invest—whether in public streetscapes, along major transport
corridors, or in private residential areas such as multi-family buildings. For
expansion to gain further momentum, charging infrastructure must also be
economically viable. Customer retention, the extension of existing business
models, and the development of new markets are central incentives—and powerful
drivers—of expansion. At the same time, municipalities are key enablers of the
success of the infrastructure rollout. While they generally do not invest
themselves—and are not expected to—they play an indispensable role as
facilitators: They control access to public streets and municipal land, handle
permitting processes, foster local acceptance, and coordinate relevant
stakeholders. Without municipal involvement, a demand-driven and accelerated
rollout is simply not feasible.
Which insights from pilot projects have proven
particularly valuable for scaling up the nationwide charging infrastructure?
With around 160,000 publicly accessible charging points, we are now standing at
the threshold of a mass market. The pilot project phase is over—what’s needed
now is a user-centric and scalable approach to further infrastructure
development. That’s why we have taken a deep dive into the needs of users. Findings
from our internal study “Charging Infrastructure in the Mass Market”
show: Home charging remains the most important use case—particularly in
single-family homes. About 80 percent of respondents reported using this
charging scenario. However, more and more EV drivers now live in urban areas
and multi-family buildings, where private parking—and thus easy home charging
access—is often lacking. Public charging locations such as curbside spaces or
customer parking lots are therefore gaining importance. Over 40 percent of new
entrants to the EV market already use these charging options—a clear signal of
their growing relevance. Another key factor is user-friendliness: complex apps
or non-transparent pricing discourage use. On the other hand, unified and easy
payment systems—especially for spontaneous ad hoc charging—significantly boost
acceptance. Ad hoc charging is used about three times more often by new market
participants, with mobile app payments being the most preferred method.
Variable tariffs are less favored. Grid-side requirements are also increasing
noticeably as the market grows. Smart load management will be essential to
avoid local grid overload—especially in urban areas with rising simultaneous
charging demand. Early and coordinated involvement of grid operators in project
planning is just as important as the growing deployment of decentralized
storage systems. These contribute to grid stability and create additional
flexibility—an aspect that will only gain further importance as the market
continues to expand.