3 Questions for… Simon Haverkamp, Manager e-mobility, Accenture
“V2G services most likely start with fleet operators”
Competition of V2G and Stationary Storage Systems: Haverkamp’s topic on 28 May.
Accenture
In the run-up to the ChargeTec Conference, we interviewed Simon Haverkamp, Manager e-mobility at Accenture. The 5th edition of the international event will take place on 27 and 28 May 2025 in Munich, Haverkamp is one of the speakers.
Simon
Haverkamp brings extensive experience in the development of charging
infrastructure and the integration of energy systems. With a background in
electrical engineering from RWTH Aachen University, he has held key roles at
Umlaut energy and now at Accenture, focusing on the intersection of mobility
and energy.
ADT: At the
ChargeTec, Haverkamp will share his insights on what use cases are interesting
for V2G and what competitive technologies it must challenge.
Haverkamp: How
do you evaluate the long-term economic viability of V2G compared to stationary
battery storage?
Haverkamp: Bidirectional charging in general has a high potential and
therefore a high viability. The question is, which use-cases will be the ones
to participate. The use-cases “behind the meter” (V2H), where the vehicle owner
directly benefits from the usage of the battery, are very attractive. The idea
behind V2G is that the vehicle batteries exist anyway and are not utilized 90%
of the day, therefore it is just an additional benefit to use them for grid
services. V2G applications where the vehicle is participating in different
energy markets, e.g., to stabilize the grid frequency, require a big value
chain of parties to enable it, from the single vehicle owners, over aggregators
to energy traders. It requires a very large pool of vehicles to guarantee
statistically available power and energy. And furthermore, it requires
certification of the vehicles as generating units and regulatory adjustments. Stationary
storages nowadays are often installed for peak shaving on the grid connection
point for big charging parks in multi-megawatt dimensions.
So both EVs and
those stationary storages are primarily built for a different task and
therefore the asset costs of the battery do not need to be covered by the grid
services; it is just additional revenue potential. Since they are stationary,
much bigger per unit, and operated by a small number of professional players,
it is much easier to aggregate them and get the statistically relevant
availability, which makes them cheaper in comparison to an aggregation of
private cars in the end. The different markets to participate are limited in
their size and eventually saturated. So the question I am raising here is if there
will be a market left for V2G and which one is it? On the V2G side, the
arbitrage use-case, which means using electricity price fluctuations to make
profit, is most likely big enough. But this can be partly addressed with smart
charging (V1G) already, meaning you charge when prices are low and don’t charge
when they are high.
What key
market segments are most suitable for early adoption of V2G applications?
From a use-case perspective, everything behind the meter (V2H) will start
first. These use-cases are attractive and relatively easy to implement. The V2G
use-cases require prequalification, regulatory adjustments, setup of
aggregators, and new business models. This is not a stable field to play for
now. From a user perspective, the private vehicle owners are able to use the
vehicle battery as home storage or independent power source for emergency
(blackout) or vehicle-to-load applications. The V2G
services most likely start with fleet operators like school buses first.
How should regulators address the
interoperability between mobile and stationary energy systems?
From the regulatory perspective, this should be no problem. They are two
different providers for the same service, and the cheaper one will be awarded
the contract. The regulatory hurdles are to enable this kind of service for
small aggregated systems at all and to harmonize the requirements among Europe
at least. When it comes to microgrid and island use-cases, like a blackout
emergency system for your house, there might still be some interoperability
issues if different sources of energy have to work together, like the PV
system, a home-storage battery, and bidirectional EVs.