3 Questions for… Augustin Friedel, Senior Manager SDV, MHP Management
“Collaboration models between OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers are frequently underdeveloped”
Software-Defined-Vehicles: Approaches and Progress in the Industry – Friedel’s topic on 21 May.
Marco Lombardi
In the lead-up to the 6th International Automotive Software Strategies Conference, we asked Augustin Friedel, Senior Manager SDV at MHP Management, three questions. The event will take place on 21 and 22 May 2025 in Munich, and Friedel is one of the speakers.
As
the automotive industry accelerates toward SDVs, Friedel offers a grounded view
of the sector’s current progress and pitfalls. While tech-driven entrants like
Tesla are pushing boundaries with integrated stacks and fast iteration, Friedel
highlights how traditional OEMs are now rapidly catching up by leveraging deep
automotive expertise and scaling capabilities.
With his team, Friedel supports clients from various industries, such as
manufacturers, suppliers, and mobility startups. He studied mechanical
engineering and management at the TU Munich and subsequently worked for
well-known startups such as Uber, Blacklane, and Rocket Internet. Before
joining MHP, he held various strategic positions at Volkswagen.
ADT: What are the main roadblocks currently slowing down industry-wide SDV
implementation?
Friedel: The complexity of existing E/E architectures
and the challenge of integrating legacy systems definitely pose some of the
main roadblocks slowing down the industry-wide SDV implementation. Additionally,
the severe shortage of skilled professionals in software and AI slows down
development significantly. Regulatory hurdles, particularly in safety and
cybersecurity, add further layers of complexity to bringing SDV solutions to
market. Another critical issue is the lack of standardized platforms and
scalable over-the-air (OTA) infrastructure, which are essential for efficient
deployment and updates. Many organizations fail to adequately address the
internal transformation required to shift toward a software-centric mindset.
Furthermore, collaboration models between OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers are
frequently underdeveloped or even entirely missing. The industry's current
focus on flagship projects rather than rapid scaling across entire product
portfolios is limiting the broader adoption of SDV technologies.
How do
you assess the maturity of SDV initiatives across OEMs versus tech-driven
entrants?
There is a clear contrast between the two. Tech-driven
entrants like Tesla and Nio are leading the way when it comes to software
innovation. They've built fully integrated in-house software stacks, have
highly effective OTA capabilities, and operate with fast, data-driven
development cycles. Their focused approach to AI and autonomy allows them to
move quickly and iterate faster than most traditional players. However, tech
players still face some hurdles, especially when it comes to deep automotive
know-how. This often leads to early challenges in execution, but they're
learning fast. The real issue is the sustainability of their business models.
Many are still operating at a loss and rely heavily on investor funding without
generating positive cash flow.
OEMs, on the other hand, tend to take a
partnership-driven route, working with companies like Microsoft, AWS, or
Horizon Robotics. That will slow things down a bit, but it will also give them
access to specialized expertise. OEMs are unparalleled in their ability to
scale. They have decades of experience in global production, quality assurance
and bringing vehicles to market at scale – and they are picking up speed. Some
have already reached the point of serial production for SDV-ready vehicles, and
we expect broader scaling over the next 6 to 18 months. They are also
accelerating development in key markets to stay competitive. It is clear that
while tech entrants are setting the pace in software, OEMs are definitely
catching up. They have the industrial backbone and market reach to deliver SDV
at scale.
How do
German SDV projects differ from SDV projects in other countries?
German SDV projects
definitely have their own character, even if they don’t fundamentally differ
from those in other European countries or traditional U.S. OEMs. A main
difference is the strong emphasis on quality and long-term reliability over
sheer speed. There's a clear focus on doing things right – especially when it
comes to safety and cybersecurity, where standards are particularly high.
Another key difference is how closely German OEMs work with Tier-1 suppliers,
and we're also seeing an open-source mindset beginning to take hold, especially
for future vehicle platforms. This will drive more collaboration and
transparency across the ecosystem. Most SDV efforts in Germany are currently
starting in the premium segment, with players like BMW and Mercedes leading the
way. The rollout to volume models is planned over the next few years. This is a
more cautious, phased approach compared to some international players who aim
for speed and broad market coverage right away.