Interview with Robert Isele, Inova Semiconductors
“ISELED is no longer an experimental concept”
Robert Isele, GM and CEO of Inova Semiconductors, has extensive automotive experience from his decades at BMW Group, where he worked on display technologies, driver information systems and interior lighting. At Inova, he now focuses on advanced display and lighting applications as well as high-speed automotive data transmission.
Inova
As vehicle interiors become increasingly software-defined, digital lighting must scale beyond design features. Robert Isele, GM and CEO of Inova Semiconductors, explains how ISELED, ILaS and open ecosystems can support this shift.
As automotive interiors become more digital, networked and
software-controlled, lighting is moving closer to
displays, sensors, user interfaces and zonal E/E architectures. Robert
Isele, General Manager and CEO of Inova Semiconductors, has spent decades in
the automotive industry, including at BMW Group, where he worked on display
technologies, driver information system architectures and interior lighting.
Since the beginning of 2024, he has been leading Inova Semiconductors, a
company focused on technologies for advanced display and lighting applications
as well as high-speed automotive data transmission.
At the Automotive Lighting
Conference in Munich on 30 June 2026, Isele will give an update on the
ISELED Alliance and its outlook. Ahead of the event, we spoke with him about
why scalable digital lighting is becoming an
architectural question, where current vehicle architectures still fall
short and how open ecosystems can help bring intelligent lighting into series
production.
Looking
ahead three to five years, what will be the biggest bottleneck in scaling
dynamic digital interior lighting across future vehicle architectures?
The biggest
bottleneck will not be the LED component itself. It will be the architecture
around it. Dynamic interior lighting is moving from a simple decorative feature
to a software-controlled, functional part of the vehicle experience. In future
vehicles, lighting will need to interact with displays, sensors,
driver-assistance functions, user interfaces and zonal
E/E architectures. This requires seamless, reliable and fully
transparent communication, synchronization, diagnostics, calibration on the
edge across a large number of smart light elements.
From Inova’s perspective,
scalability will depend on whether the industry manages to treat digital
lighting as part of the vehicle architecture, rather than as a stand-alone
feature added late in each vehicle program. Without standardised building
blocks, open interfaces and efficient network concepts, complexity, wiring
effort, validation cost and software integration will become limiting factors.
Another important aspect is supply-chain robustness. Digital lighting will
become a high-volume architectural element, not a niche feature. Therefore,
OEMs and Tier 1s need technologies that are not only technically scalable, but
also industrially scalable. This is one of the reasons why Inova has built
ISELED around a multi-source and ecosystem strategy. Today, our wafer supply is
supported by established foundry partners, including GlobalFoundries and
Samsung Foundry.
This gives customers a more resilient supply chain, reduces
dependency on a single manufacturing path and supports regional flexibility in
a geopolitically more complex world. With more than 500 million ISELED devices
already in the field and strong further growth expected, the technology has
moved well beyond the proof-of-concept phase. The key question for the next
three to five years is therefore not whether digital lighting works, but how
the industry scales it reliably across platforms, regions and vehicle segments.
Speed makes the difference: ready-to-use components and a strong supply base
accelerate time to market.
Which
decision being made today will most strongly determine whether interior
lighting becomes a standardized architecture element or remains a highly
customized feature in each vehicle program?
The key decision is whether OEMs and Tier 1s define digital lighting as
an architectural layer with reusable interfaces, or whether they continue to implement it as a
highly customized feature for each vehicle program. There will always be
OEM-specific differentiation in the lighting experience. That is important and
should remain. E/E architecture should be standardized at the zonal level, but
the last-mile electronics, communication, diagnostics, calibration and
integration should be simple, hardware-defined and plug-and-play-ready. This is
exactly where concepts such as ISELED and ILaS can help.
They provide a system
approach for smart, calibrated and individually controllable LEDs, supported by
an ecosystem of semiconductor companies, LED manufacturers, Tier 1s, software
partners and technology specialists. Standardization at this level does not
reduce differentiation. On the contrary, it gives OEMs a scalable foundation on
which they can create their own brand-specific lighting experiences. In our view,
the industry should be careful not to replace one form of complexity with
another. A technically elegant solution is not enough if it creates unnecessary
lock-in, limits sourcing flexibility or makes the supply chain less resilient.
The stronger approach is an open, alliance-based architecture that allows
competition and cooperation at the same time.
Where do
current lighting and data architectures still fall short when it comes to
supporting large numbers of intelligent, individually controlled lighting
elements in the vehicle?
Many
current architectures were not originally designed for hundreds or even
thousands of intelligent, individually controlled light points. As a result,
they can become fragmented, wiring-intensive and difficult to scale. The main
limitations are communication efficiency, deterministic control,
synchronization, diagnostics at component level, EMC robustness, software
integration and the ability to update and manage lighting functions over the
vehicle lifetime. In many cases, the architecture still treats lighting as a
local subsystem rather than as a connected part of the overall digital vehicle.
For future interiors, this will no longer be sufficient.
Lighting will increasingly need to work together with
displays, sensors, safety-related signals and user interaction. That
requires both smart local control close to the LED and efficient connection to
higher-level vehicle networks. There is also a strategic dimension.
Architectures that are optimized around a single proprietary component or one
closed implementation can be difficult to adapt when requirements, suppliers or
regional sourcing strategies change. A more open and modular architecture makes
it easier to qualify multiple partners, adapt to regional supply-chain
requirements and reduce geopolitical exposure without redesigning the complete
lighting system.
What
role can ISELED and related network concepts realistically play as interior
lighting becomes more dynamic, distributed and software-controlled?
ISELED and
related concepts such as ILaS can play a very practical role. They are not just
about controlling RGB LEDs. They provide a scalable system concept for
intelligent, calibrated and networked lighting elements. The strength of ISELED is that it reduces system
complexity while enabling precise digital control of many individual LEDs.
ILaS extends this idea into a broader network approach for lighting and
sensor-related applications. This becomes increasingly relevant as interior
lighting becomes more dynamic, distributed and connected to software-defined
vehicle functions. Realistically, ISELED and ILaS can become important building
blocks between the local lighting level and the broader vehicle architecture.
They allow the industry to standardize the foundation while still giving OEMs
freedom to differentiate through design, software, interaction concepts and
brand experience.
A major advantage of the ISELED Alliance is that it is not
built around one company trying to control the complete value chain. It brings
together semiconductor companies, LED manufacturers, Tier 1s, design experts,
software partners and OEM-facing technology companies. This creates a broad
ecosystem rather than a closed island solution. That ecosystem is very
important for the automotive industry. OEMs need interoperability, qualified
partners, long-term availability and second-source strategies. With a large
installed base, strong growth and a broad supplier network, ISELED has
effectively become a quasi-industry standard for intelligent digital interior
lighting. The role of ISELED and ILaS is therefore not only technical. They
provide a proven and scalable foundation that helps the industry move from
project-specific implementations to reusable lighting architectures.
How will
high-speed automotive data transmission change the relationship between
displays, lighting, sensors and zonal architectures in future vehicle
interiors?
High-speed automotive data transmission will be one of the key enablers
for the future digital vehicle interior. Displays, lighting and sensors are
increasingly connected. The interior is becoming an interactive digital space
where visual information, ambient light, functional signals, user interaction
and sensor feedback need to work together in real time. This cannot be achieved
efficiently if every function is treated as a separate island. From Inova’s
perspective, the future architecture will combine high-speed data backbones
with simple local networks. High-speed transmission technologies such as
APXpress can support the move towards scalable data architectures for displays,
sensors and zonal systems.
At the same time, concepts such as ISELED and ILaS
can efficiently handle distributed digital lighting functions close to the
application. The important point is that lighting, displays and sensors should
no longer be considered separately. They will increasingly become part of one
coordinated interior experience, enabled by robust and scalable data
communication. This is also where architectural openness matters. Future
vehicle interiors will evolve over several model generations. OEMs need
architectures that allow them to add functions, change suppliers, localize
production and react to geopolitical or supply-chain constraints without
starting from zero. Open, scalable network concepts are therefore not only a
technical advantage, but also a strategic one.
Where
should the industry draw the line between standardization for cost and
scalability, and OEM-specific differentiation in digital lighting experiences?
The industry should standardize what the end
customer does not directly perceive: communication interfaces, diagnostics,
basic software integration and electrical robustness. German thoroughness down
to the last device does not help here. OEM differentiation should happen where
the customer does perceive value: design language,
light choreography, personalization, interaction concepts, safety-related
visual communication and the overall brand experience. This distinction
is important. Standardization should not make lighting experiences look the
same. It should make them easier, faster and more cost-efficient to implement.
A standardized technical foundation gives OEMs more freedom to innovate at the
experience level, because they do not have to solve the same architectural
problems again in every program. In addition, standardization should not mean
dependence on one closed implementation.
For the automotive industry, real
standardization must support a healthy supply chain, multiple qualified
partners and long-term availability. This is where an alliance-based approach
has clear advantages. It supports competition inside the ecosystem, avoids
unnecessary lock-in and gives OEMs more freedom in sourcing and regional
manufacturing strategies. In today’s geopolitical environment, this is becoming
just as important as technical performance. A technology that is already proven
in high volumes, supported by multiple ecosystem partners and manufactured
through established foundry sources is much closer to what the automotive
industry needs than a proprietary approach that may look attractive technically
but creates new dependencies in the supply chain. Another important point is
that digital lighting should not be seen only as styling or decoration. It can
contribute to comfort, orientation, communication, personalization and safety
inside the vehicle.
To unlock this potential, the industry needs open ecosystems and cooperation across the value chain,
from semiconductor companies and LED manufacturers to Tier 1s, software
partners and OEMs. This has always been one of the core ideas behind the ISELED
Alliance: to create a scalable and interoperable foundation for the next
generation of automotive lighting. The maturity of the technology is also
important. With more than 500 million devices already in the field, strong
further growth and a quality level in the close-to-zero ppb range, ISELED is no
longer an experimental concept. It is a proven industrial platform. This
combination of ecosystem, field experience, supply-chain resilience and quality
performance is why ISELED can be regarded as a quasi-industry standard for
software-defined automotive lighting. It gives OEMs and Tier 1s a reliable
foundation for innovation without forcing them into a closed or single-source
architecture.